Thursday, November 19, 2015


RIP & TEAR

The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in

Carithers v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 782 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2015)

 

By: Amanda K. Anderson, Esquire

Boyle, Gentile & Leonard, P.A.


 

Prior to the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in Carithers, the law surrounding the removal and replacement of the defective work itself, even if it caused “property damage”, was less than clear. See Boran Craig Barber Homes v. Mid-Continent, No. 2:06-cv-89 – Doc. 262 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 2009); Arnett v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 2010WL2821981 (S.D. Fla. 2010); Assurance Company of America v. Lucas Waterproofing Co. Inc., 581 F.Supp.2d 1201 (S.D. Fla.2008).

In Carithers, the district court found that a balcony was defectively constructed, which caused damage to a garage. Carithers v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 782 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2015). The district court also recognized that, under Florida law, the defectively constructed balcony was not covered by the policy. Id. However, the district court found as a fact that, in order to repair the garage (which the parties agree constituted property damage), the balcony had to be rebuilt. Id.

The insurer, Mid–Continent Casualty Company (“MCC”), did not contend that this factual finding was clearly erroneous. Id.Rather, MCC claimed that the Carithers cannot recover for any defective work, even where repairing that work is a necessary cost of repairing work for which there is coverage. Id.

The Eleventh Circuit held that the district court did not err in awarding damages for the cost of repairing the balcony. Id. Under Florida law, the Carithers had a right to “the costs of repairing damage caused by the defective work....” U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. J.S.U.B., Inc., 979 So.2d 871, 889 (Fla. 2007). Since the district court determined that repairing the balcony was part of the cost of repairing the garage, which was defective work, the Carithers were entitled to these damages. Carithers, 782 F.3d at 1251. Thus, the Eleventh Circuit has clarified that removal and replacement of the defective work itself is covered a “damages because of ‘property damage’”.

 

 

1 comment:

  1. Playtika is a developer on 파라오카지노 Google Play with a couple of of} slots games. There are three to choose from|to choose from} they usually have kind of the identical mechanics. You get some beginning cash, wager it on the slots, and either method for extra if you go broke or maintain enjoying in} should you win. Slotomania Slots is the developer’s hallmark app and most of its complaints revolve across the rarity of the wins. If you’re okay with that, these are first rate Android slots games. Pharaoh’s Way Slots certainly one of the|is among the|is doubtless considered one of the} most popular slots games on the market.

    ReplyDelete